Wednesday, January 30, 2008

If Michael Bay lays a finger on "The Baby", I'm-a fuck him up big time




Yes, in case you haven't heard, Michael Bay is continuing his assault on everything that mattered from my childhood by "relaunching" the Nightmare on Elm Street series from the beginning.

This of course follows the news that Bay's company, Platinum Dunes, is similarly "overhauling" the Friday the 13th franchise (which was overhauling itself already, from what I could tell) and has already redone The Hitcher, The Amityville Horror, and The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, and was also responsible for turning the Transformers - easily the most beloved cartoon and toy of my young years - into the loudest computer-generated abortion in history.

Of all of these projects, the only I liked was Chain Saw, and I credit most of that to Marcus Nispel (who is also helming the Friday remake, which sounds the most promising of the bunch). But really, Nightmare? Why remake genre-leveling perfection? What could possibly be improved upon ... Heather Langenkamp's acting aside? And Ronee Blakely's? And Amanda Wyss's? Okay, maybe they have a point ... but can they get Lyn Shaye back to reprise her career-defining role?!?!

What's next, you ask? Uh ... how about the Near Dark and The Birds remakes they have in the works? God almighty ... is it too early for Suzanne Pleshette to be rolling in her grave?

Needless to say, if Humbert doesn't get a call to try out for the new Freddy, he is gonna be PISSED...

Labels: , , , , , ,

4 Comments:

Blogger Clinton said...

I've seen the original Nightmare so many times, I've lost count. Needless to say, I think this is a horrible idea. Particularly because... what, they're going to recast Freddy? Like there's anyone else that can play him besides Robert Englund? Bull-poopy.

January 30, 2008 9:42 PM  
OpenID veiledexuberance said...

I'm usually so on point with you but taint a damn thing wrong with Heather's acting. Nancy was perfection.

Otherwise, yeah... like, kill Bay and all that jazz. Grr.

Seriously. What the hell is going on in Hollywood? I'm-a scurred.

January 31, 2008 8:59 PM  
Blogger campbloodbuzz said...

Aight, I'll grant you that in the original her performance is definitely better than in 3, when it all really went to pot. But looking at the film as a whole I think the performances are the weak spot, as the rest of it is so effing inspired. Excusing John Saxon, of course. He's sex on toast.

January 31, 2008 9:40 PM  
Blogger Not_So_Witty said...

Is Johnny Depp old enough to play the Sheriff father yet?

PS: SO glad this is back up and running :)

February 1, 2008 11:37 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home