Friday, February 13, 2009

"Friday the 13th": Jason goes to hell


Alright, I know I haven't been updating much (coughATALLcough!) lately, and I actually don't even have the time to be trying to address this topic with any degree of thoughtfulness, but I of course had to weigh in on the slick, CW-stuffed remake of Friday the 13th that is hacking its way into theaters tonight.

I caught the movie the other night with a heart full of anticipation and a head full of dreams of sugarplum fairies and sliced coeds and all sorts of other crap. See, you may remember that I actually LIKED the Texas Chainsaw Massacre remake that these fellas churned out a few years back, so I figured that if anyone could manage a successful reboot of a beloved horror franchise, it would be they. (And not, say, Rob Zombie, who can forever suck my ass for his back-alley abortion of a Halloween.)

So it is with a heavy heart that I inform you that this remake kinda shits the bed.

It's not a disaster. I wouldn't go that far. But it misses the point of what really makes Friday Friday, and instead tries to turn it into Chainsaw 2: Leatherface Joins the Mighty Ducks.


First problem: Jason lives underground in a tunnel and keeps prisoners. Wha-wa-WHAAAAAT?! Oh please. Jason is far too busy to be bothered with houseguests, even if they do vaguely resemble his mother. Which brings me to the biggest gaping logic hole in this whole thing: If Jason was indeed alive and saw his mother beheaded in the woods (this reboot conveniently says that the tot wasn't dead, which takes care of the "aging dead kid" continuity issue that the originals had), then why was momma killing the counselers to begin with? This version makes a HUGE deal out of Jason's connection to his mom (who, sadly, is in the movie for all of 23 seconds), so why was the kid pretending to be dead and following his mom around while she killed everyone to begin with?

After a rather disturbing opening 15-minute sequence in which the filmmakers are probably hoping to confuse us, as they kill off the entire cast (saw that one coming from the trailers, thanks), the movie totally flatlines for the next hour. It's not as mean as the first segment (the sleeping bag barbecue in particular is NASTY!) so it doesn't maintain the kind of grueling intensity as Chainsaw, which is okay since it's a body-count movie, not a survival flick. But they also miss the mark by making the characters so humorless and loathsome and the murders so gruesome and unpleasant that it's hard to have fun watching the bodies pile up.

Case in point: Every female character who dies (save one) shows her tits. Even former pop princess Willa Ford has to first waterski topless - TOPLESS! - before getting a machete in her head with her ya-ya's out. The girls are uniformly piggish sluts, and the guys are no better. In fact, in this age of diverse casting, the filmmakers are actually so lazy as to basically say, "Well, if we cast a black guy and an Asian guy we really don't need to give them any other defining characteristics." Um, not exactly, guys.

Go ahead and rewatch the originals - while the characters were horny and ridiculous, they weren't total assholes. The couples actually enjoyed one another, where here all the sex is grudgefucking where the guys slap around the girls and the girls like it.

Body-count movies are supposed to have an element of fun to them. Otherwise the experience of watching over a dozen people die horrible deaths starts to become grating, or even unpleasant. If you look at this Friday remake versus the My Bloody Valentine remake from a month ago (which had its own faults, sure), the Valentine guys clearly "got it" in terms of how to gruesomely hack up dozens of people and make it into a good time, and these guys didn't. Hell, Valentine even managed to put a full 5-minute chase scene where the victim is fully nude and in 3-D, and it still didn't feel exploitative or tasteless like this one does.


But this brings me to the only real reason to sit through all of Friday to the end: The bodacious ta-tas of one Jared Padalecki. Like his Supernatural boyfriend - er, brother - Jensen Ackles, he's using a horror reboot to make his mark on the winter box office. And while Ackles' movie is a better one, Padalecki has clearly been hitting the gym to fill out his costume, and his perky nips may just be enough to guide you out of the woods once and for all.

So while not a total disaster, this wasn't the return to Camp Blood that I was hoping for. It's an unduly misogynistic and occasionally rather boring reimagining that downgrades one of our greatest masked men to being yet another retard in the woods with mommy issues and no sense for decorating. And if I wanted to see that, I'd rent Nell.

Labels: , , ,

6 Comments:

Blogger Clyde Squid said...

And yet, I still have to see it...

Curse these wretched franchises!

February 15, 2009 1:32 AM  
Blogger slasherfan said...

I have to say I don't think this is a downgrade from the Friday films we've gotten in the last 20 years. It's getting the franchise closer to where I want it, although it's not perfect, of course. For Part 12, I think it's great! The logic holes... I just used my imagination. This is a pretty easy movie to pick on, but if I was honest about any F13 movie, I'd come up with the same. My expectations were to see Jason slice and dice in the woods again, and I was not disappointed. All my friends who saw it with me (most not nearly as into horror or F13 as I am) enjoyed it. I didn't expect the same perfection out of a Friday the 13th remake than Halloween. Making Friday the 13th movies actually "good" to the level of the original Halloween (please don't explain anymore of those plot holes, Rob Zombie) would take away, for me, something essential to the series. I'll be happier to put this DVD on my shelf, again, than Parts 8-11.

February 16, 2009 10:17 AM  
Blogger darkesaint said...

It was all right for matinee pricing, but I wouldn't go so far as to say this made F13 a much better franchise. For a quick minute, I was trying to search for a possible gay character. After meeting the cast, I was glad there was no gay character. Total meat-head city, and all I could say to myself is, "What a terrible tumble Willa Ford has taken...". All I can hope is the remake of Nightmare on Elm Street gets the can before it leaves the office. I will not have my Freddy defiled by some half-wit!

February 24, 2009 11:36 PM  
Blogger Nathan Buck said...

Dear Mr. Horror Homo,

It was great to stumble across your review of the new Friday the 13th while I was perusing Rotten Tomatoes. Your comment about watching Nell instead made me laugh out loud, so I had to click into your blog to see, "Who the heck is this guy?"

I do have to say I disagree with you about F13; I found it to be a nice throwback to the first few F13 flicks, and I loved that it was a "reboot" and sequel at the same time. Re-watching it on DVD (the extended Killer Cut, naturally), I was even more impressed with the painstaking care taken of delivering fans the goods. (One detail: when hottie Jared and what's-her-name are hiding under the house or porch or whatever, they're right behind the bull's eye archery target, something I didn't catch on first viewing.) And I do love how we're dropped into the suspense right away with the Alice/Mrs. Voorhees stand-off, and the editing of that opening sequence is fresh and raw.

Have you watched Jared and fellow hottie Jensen in Supernatural? I think you made reference to that in your blog post. I like to call it Superhotties or HGFE (Hot Guys Fighting Evil). As a fellow horror homo, I'm now in love with your blog.

Feel free to check out my own, Violent Perfumes, at:
www.nathanbuck.blogspot.com

And thanks again for making me laugh!

Best Regards,
Nathan

July 17, 2009 12:23 PM  
Anonymous ugg amelie suede sandal said...

0227sllrk Perhaps this is your first visit to this ugg classic cardy and you're unfamiliar with Ryan Ringold.If so, you'll find his ugg classic crochet credentials and background information below.On the Internet,it's tough to know ugg classic short who to believe.There are so many people making ugg classic tall ridiculous claims,it's insane.It's like day after day,you get hit ugg classic mini with hype pitch after hype pitch.

February 27, 2010 11:01 AM  
Anonymous ugg coquette casual shoes said...

0305sllrk My company and I are reputable ugg bailey button ,credible, and have helped people just like you ugg shoes 5389 in over 5 different countries.I've been doing business online since March, 12 2002 ugg ultra tall .I've helped hundreds of people with ugg ultra short their wedding speeches.My company was on the front page of ugg nightfall boots the'The Wall Street Journal' June 19, 2002

March 4, 2010 10:02 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home